Azov was a company from Crimea (Ukraine) which filmed boys in non-sexual .. Buku Ajar Kardiologi Anak Pdf 77lAzov Films posted material about the legality of its products on its website, and sold its non-sexual nudist DVDs, mostly showing sports scenes, ...
azov films scenes from crimea vol 1 2009
Azovfilms.com [1] was the web site of a company based in Canada, which sold films and literature in which boys play the leading roles. The company marketed films from around the world, particularly on topics related to "coming-of-age" and was a redistributor of Award Films International and other film distributors including Europa Sun Productions and Baikal Films which sold award winning international videos and art. In addition, videos were produced especially for the company and bore the Azov label; most have naturist/nudist content.
Azov films web site operated for approximately 11 years and was considered at the time to be legal. The company's website had a disclaimer with statements from legal experts indicating that the merchandise being sold was legal in the US and Canada. [2] These films did not contain images of children having sex as has been reported by law enforcement [3] and tabloid journalists however they do contain non-sexual nudity and some but not all of the titles offered have been deemed by law enforcement and court officials to fall under the very broad and dubious category of lascivious exhibition.[4]
Vladik (born in 1990) is at the center of many of the films of the years 2001 to 2006. His name appears in many film titles. It is still present in later films, mostly as an assistant or photographer. A traffic accident claimed his life in October 2009. Two friends of the same age, Cyril and Arsen, also appear in films until 2006 approximately.
The island is populated, reported to have under 30 people in 2012. A village, Bile, was founded in February 2007 with the purpose of consolidating the status of the island as an inhabited place. This happened during the period in which the island was part of a border dispute between Romania and Ukraine from 2004 to 2009, during which Romania contested the technical definition of the island and borders around it. The territorial limits of the continental shelf around Snake Island were delineated by the International Court of Justice in 2009,[2] providing Romania with almost 80% of the disputed maritime territory.[3]
The island lacks a fresh water source.[11] Its border guard contingent is regularly resupplied by air.[12] Since 2009 the development of the island was suspended due to financing which caused a great degree of concern of local authorities asking for more funding from the state.[13]
On 3 February 2009, the ICJ delivered its judgment, which divided the sea area of the Black Sea along a line which was between the claims of each country. The Court invoked the disproportionality test in adjudicating the dispute, noting that the ICJ, "as its jurisprudence has indicated, it may on occasion decide not to take account of very small islands or decide not to give them their full potential entitlement to maritime zones, should such an approach have a disproportionate effect on the delimitation line under consideration" and owing to a previous agreement between Ukraine and Romania, the island "should have no effect on the delimitation in this case, other than that stemming from the role of the 12-nautical-mile arc of its territorial sea" previously agreed between the parties.[84]
firm the effect of protection on the change of P. crispa the condition over the 1964-2020. Particularly, much less interannual biomass decrease inside MPAs compared to unprotected areas (see Fig. 3) might result from underrepresentation of deep-water data (> 5 m) in the analysis: for PAs, they comprised only 50% of the total dataset, while for unprotected areas they did 83%. The lack of statistical power and the need for additional resources were reported to have a role in preventing the detection of consequences of human exclusion for macroalgae in other studies (Fraschetti et al., 2005; Currie & Sorokin, 2009).
Capturing of plants and animals is prohibited in the studied MPAs (PARF, 2022). However, we believe this measure does not considerably affect the abundance of P. crispa, since its main impact is on commercial species (Claudet et al., 2008), while P. crispa has never been of commercial importance along the Crimean coast. Furthermore, its harvesting is prohibited being a protected species (Bucharest Convention, 1992; Bardunov & Novikov, 2008). Nevertheless, no-take protection can influence the state of macrophyte populations indirectly, via trophic cascades triggered by change in abundance of top predators controlling algal feeders (Lester et al., 2009; Shears & Babcock, 2003). Although this effect on P. crispa in the Black Sea has not been studied (Berov et al., 2018), up to the present it seems to have been insignificant, since P. crispa has not been noted in the herbivorous fish diet (Kalinina, 1963; Shaganov, 2018) and is even less preferable for herbivorous invertebrates than most common Ericaria crinita and Gongolaria barbata (Makkaveeva, 1964), the amount of which consumed by invertebrates is known to be small (Makkaveeva, 1974). At the same time, an alien herbivorous fish Sarpa salpa (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Mediterranean, has naturalised off the southwestern coast of Crimea over the past 20 years, including the area adjacent to Cape Aya Sanctuary (Abliazov et al., 2021), and within CAC near Cape Fiolent NM (Boltachev et al., 2009). Sarpa salpa can significantly reduce macrophyte abundance (Gianni et al., 2017), and is likely capable to alter species composition through selective grazing (Verlaque, 1990), especially in MPAs where it is protected from being caught (Raventos et al., 2009; Parravicini et al., 2013). In the Mediterranean, P. crispa was reported to constitute only 5.0-6.6% of the S. salpa diet (Verlaque, 1990), but in the Black Sea, its feeding preferences and effect on seaweed communities are unknown and need to be investigated. Additional measures to prevent invasive species from being introduced and naturalised are desirable to take as well.
Abaza V, Dumitrache C., Filimon A., Marin O. 2019. Present ecological status of the main benthic habitats from the Romanian Black Sea Shelf. Marine Research Journal 49(1): 74-91. DOI: 10.55268/CM.2019.49.74 Abliazov E.R., Boltachev A.R., Karpova E.P., Pashkov A.N., Danilyuk O.N. 2021. Ichthyofauna of the Black Sea coastal zone in the Laspi Bay area (Crimea). Marine Biological Journal 6(2): 3-17. DOI: 10.21072/mbj.2021.06.2.01 Agardy T., di Sciara N.G., Christie P. 2011. Mind the gap: Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 35(2): 226-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar-pol.2010.10.006 Alexandrov B., Minicheva G., Zaitsev Y. 2017. Black Sea Network of Marine Protected areas: European approaches and adaptation to expansion and monitoring in Ukraine. In: P.D. Goriup (Ed.): Management of Marine Protected Areas: A Network Perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. P. 227-246. DOI: 10.1002/9781119075806.ch12 Babcock R.C., Kelly S., Shears N.T., Walker J.W., Willis T.J. 1999. Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 189: 125134. DOI: 10.3354/meps189125 Bardunov L.V, Novikov VS. (Eds.). 2008. Red Data Book of the Russian Federation. Plants and Fungi. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 885 p. [In Russian] Barrett M.S., Buxton C.D., Edgar G.J. 2009. Changes in invertebrate and macroalgal populations in Tasmanian marine reserves in the decade following protection. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 370(1-2): 104-119. DOI: 10.1016/J.JEMBE.2008.12.005 Begun T., Muresan M., Zaharia T., Dencheva K., Sezgin M., Bat L., Velikova V 2012. Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity. Review of the existing and planned protected areas in the Black Sea (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey) with a special focus on possible deficiencies regarding law enforcement and implementation of management plans. EC DG Env. MISIS Project Deliverables. 110 p.
Begun T., Teaca A., Murean M., Quijón P.A., Menabit S., Su-rugiu V. 2022. Habitat and Macrozoobenthic Diversity in Marine Protected Areas of the Southern Romanian Black Sea Coast. Frontiers in Marine Science 9: 845507. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.845507 Benedetti-Cecchi L., Bertocci I., Micheli F., Maggi E., Fosella T., Vaselli S. 2003. Implications of spatial heterogeneity for management of marine protected areas (MPAs): examples from assemblages of rocky coasts in the northwest Mediterranean. Marine Environmental Research 55(5): 429-458. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00310-0 Berov B., Todorova M., Dimitrov L., Rinde E., Karamfilov V. 2018. Distribution and abundance of phytobenthic communities: Implications for connectivity and ecosystem functioning in a Black Sea marine protected area. Es-tuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 200: 234-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.11.020 Boersma P.D., Parrish J.K. 1999. Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics 31(2): 287-304. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00085-3 Boltachev A.R. 2006. Trawl fishery and its effect on the bottom biocenoses in the Black Sea. Marine Ecological Journal 5(3): 45-56. [In Russian] Boltachev A.R., Karpova E.P., Danilyuk O.N. 2009. Findings of new and rare fish species in the coastal zone of the Crimea (the Black Sea). Journal of Ichthyology 49(4): 277-291. DOI: 10.1134/S0032945209040018 Boltachev A.R., Sergeeva N.G., Zagorodnyaya Yu.A., Klimova T.N. 2012. Sand mining on the shelf near Sevastopol as a threat to coastal ecosystem and biological diversity of the Black Sea. In: N.V Bagrov (Ed.): Biodiversity and Sustainable Development. Simferopol. P. 39-42. [In Russian] Bucharest Convention. 1992. Convention on the protection of the Black Sea against pollution. ANNEX 2 Provisional list of species of the Black Sea importance. Available from -commission.org/Official%20Docu-ments/The%20Convention/full%20text/ Cacabelos E., Martins G.M., Faria J., Prestes A.C.L., Costa T., Moreu I., Neto A.I. 2020. Limited effects of marine protected areas on the distribution of invasive species, despite positive effects on diversity in shallow-water marine communities. Biological Invasions 22: 1169-1179. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02171-x Ceccherelli G., Casu D., Pala D., Pinna S., Sechi N. 2006. Evaluating the effects of protection on two benthic habitats at Tavolara-Punta Coda Cavallo MPA (North-East Sardinia, Italy). Marine Environmental Research 61(2): 171-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2005.09.002 Claudet J., Osenberg C.W., Benedetti-Cecchi L., Domenici P., García-Charton J.A., Pérez-Ruzafa A., Badalamenti F., Bayle-Sempere J., Brito A., Bulleri F., Culioli J.M., Dimech M., Falcón J.M., Guala I., Milazzo M., Sánchez-Meca J., Somerfield P.J., Stobart B., Vandeperre F., Valle C., Planes S. 2008. Marine reserves: size and age do matter. Ecology Letters 11(5): 481-489. DOI: 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2008.01166.X Currie D., Sorokin S. 2009. Evaluating the effects of reserve closure on algae, invertebrate and fish assemblages at a temperate South Australian marine reserve. Journal of 2ff7e9595c
Comments